Skip to content

America and Saddam are partners

President Bush has rallied his troops for what he calls “The first warof the 21st century”. What is your view of this crisis, where, briefly, do you stand? This is the question we are putting to people around the world, especially those with their own public reputation and following. Our aim, to h

Published:

I am against war in any place on earth. I have lived in the shadow of  three wars since my childhood in the 1970s and I know the gravity of  the catastrophe it engenders.

At the same time I am against any regime that kills and liquidates its  people with every means at its disposal, bringing about the same results  as war, but more slowly, which is worse.

The American war against Iraq could not be sustained were it not for the  existence of Saddam, and Saddam would not be able to continue in power  were it not for America. Thus Saddam and his regime, and America and her  war, have become equal and opposite partners in the tragedy being meted  out upon Iraq.

I have within me a great desire to return to a Baghdad with no security  forces to compel me to join the troops going off to war; without my  tongue being cut off if I speak out against the regime; and without  having to see American soldiers festooned in combat-gear, ordering  everything in Baghdad, right down to directing traffic in the streets,  and invigilating in little schools in the sticks.

But if this desire is so difficult to realise, it is because we are in  an age of vested interest. Consider the claim “America has stirred all  these titanic armies for the sake of ‘Democracy in Iraq’… and because of  ‘chemical weapons’?” Where have these grand sentiments been since the  mid-1970s? Why did America participate in the construction of weapons of  mass destruction and aid Saddam’s regime in the killing of the people  of Iraq, and in the use of these weapons in the 1980s?  It is only  because it was America herself that equipped the regime with chemical  weapons that she knows that Saddam is hiding weapons of mass  destruction, despite the fact that the inspectors found no ‘smoking  gun’.

In 1991 America herself stood against the Iraqi people in their desire  for regime change as her plans in the region had not yet come to their  conclusion as yet. She still needed Saddam around. We want an Iraq  without Saddam and without a war… and let America realise her all other  interests as she pleases. Bush knows ways to achieve this, but they  would poorly serve his ulterior motives.

© Ahmad Mukhtar 2003

Originally published as part of a debate on 6th February 2003 Writers, artists and civic leaders on the War: Pt. II

See also Writers, artists and civic leaders on the War: Pt. 1.

Ahmad Mukhtar

Ahmad Mukhtar is an Iraqi lute-player and composer

All articles

More in Conflict & security

See all