Enough – the start-up company offering self-swab DNA kits for rape survivors – launched in Bristol in 2024 as the self-described “breathalyser of rape”. It claimed to offer a solution to the rape epidemic that survivors want.
The company hands out rape kits to students for free, while selling them online for £20. It specifically targets fathers with its “dads for daughters” product, encouraging men to “channel their inner Liam Neeson” (a reference to the film Taken) and buy five kits for £100.
As well as the kits, Enough encourages survivors to post on its online testimonial platform and offers videos with advice on how to cope with trauma following sexual violence.
But its terms and conditions reveal how Enough is very different from other organisations supporting victims and survivors of sexual abuse. The company absolves itself of any liability for survivors’ safety and wellbeing, stating that “while you may have a strong emotional reaction” to using its services, “you expressly agree to assume all risks associated with your use of the Services and not to hold Enough liable for any social, emotional, or legal consequences of such discoveries or encounters.”
Nowhere was this safeguarding gap more obvious to me than when I spoke to Maria (not her real name). After she was assaulted, Maria used an Enough kit that the company’s ambassadors had given her a few days earlier. The kit then went missing in the post on the way to the lab. While Enough’s founders apologised, they could not be held liable for the error.
These are not the terms for your phone contract. It’s not buying a dress online that the courier never delivers. This is about the safety and wellbeing of a woman who has been sexually assaulted, and whose DNA is now somewhere in a Royal Mail sorting office. How can it be possible that a company dealing with vulnerable individuals – encouraging them to take intimate tissue samples – can absolve itself of all responsibility to that victim? This is the question that has haunted me and driven me in all my investigations into Enough.
Sian Norris
Enough is a commercialised and privatised response to the social problem of sexual violence; one that puts the work of ending rape into women’s hands. It tells women that taking and using the kits is a way to “deter” rape, overturning decades of work by the violence against women sector to reassure women that it is not our responsibility to prevent sexual violence. At the same time, dads are told to cough up the cash to buy kits for their daughters in order to keep their girls safe – again, putting the responsibility on victims, not perpetrators, to end rape.
Meanwhile, the online testimonials are anonymised and posted on Enough’s social media, helping to build its audience so it can reach more people with its product.
And yet, Enough takes no responsibility for a survivor’s safety, wellbeing or subsequent legal case should she choose to report to the police. If she feels distressed or traumatised writing her testimonial, Enough is not liable. If her swab returns a false negative because the laboratory analysis misses a second of DNA, Enough is not liable. If the police and courts say her swab is not admissible as evidence, Enough is not liable. The website only says it “could” be admissible, after all.
Sian Norris
I have spent much of my career reporting on men’s violence against women and girls. I am fully aware of how the police so often fail victims and survivors. We know the police lose evidence, and the horrific consequences for survivors.
But when the worst does happen, there are structures in place to provide support and compensation. Survivors can complain to the police and the Independent Office for Police Conduct. Reviews and inquiries are launched. People lose their jobs.
The police – for all their many failings – do not have a set of terms and conditions buried on their website informing victims that they are not liable for when things go wrong. They do not absolve themselves of survivors’ safety and wellbeing. Neither do rape crisis charities nor Sexual Assault Referral Centres.
Rape and sexual violence are a national emergency. According to the National Crime Survey of England and Wales, which asks members of the public about their experiences of crime over the past 12 months, there were 214,816 sexual offences in the year leading up to September 2025, of which 74,265 were rapes. The conviction rate for rape remains horrifyingly low.
It’s no surprise that people want to grab hold of a seemingly simple solution. Wouldn’t it be comforting if we could pay £20 to keep us safe, just as it was comforting to think that if we didn’t wear the short skirt, or walk home in the dark, or take that drink, we could be safe?
But rape will not be stopped by a commercial solution that puts all the responsibility on the survivor or potential victim, while absolving the company selling the solution of all liability. It’s not possible to claim you are ending rape when you shrug responsibility for the wellbeing and safety of sexual violence survivors in order to protect your product.
