With an In/Out referendum on the horizon, we take a look at one of the EU's most maligned and misunderstood policies.
Using natural language processing (NLP) techniques, we have analysed reactions to Cameron’s speech on Twitter, focusing in particular on the sensitive issue of intra-EU migration.
It is quite possible that England will vote differently to all three other constituent parts of the UK. And certain that the politics won’t end with the result.
The EU's democratic deficit has never been more obvious. A Brexit could shake things up for the better.
Who will be seen as being on the public's side, the Ins or the Outs?
We must avoid idealist visions of a post-EU continent.
Britons want a free trade, inter-governmental Europe - yet this is not what the EU is, and it's certainly not where it's headed. Because such fundamental reforms would be needed, Brexit will be the result.
Should we fear Corbyn’s euroscepticism or is it exactly what EU-based UK emigrants need?
To campaign for remaining in the EU without advancing a set of positive reforms that address its problems, would obviously be a non-starter.
What is this crazy 'cut-off-your-nose to spite your face' strategy? How can we defend let alone improve EU workers’ rights by leaving the EU?
If David Cameron's EU referendum gamble fails and the UK votes 'no', what then for Scotland? Will it be smooth sailing to being an independent country in the European Union or tough battles with London and Brussels?
"Is a UK that retreats in isolationist but somehow progressive splendour really feasible? Surely, European countries must cooperate in the face of the deep challenges and opportunities we face."
