Skip to content

World news coverage evaporating in the UK

A new report shows that British media horizons are shrinking

Published:

International news, in case you hadn't realised, is disappearing across the UK media. The trends are documented in  'Shrinking World'  - an authoritative and compelling report on the demise of foreign news reporting in the  UK, published and written by Dr. Martin Moore and the Media Standards Trust.

The statistics make frightening reading. They compared foreign news coverage in a selection of the UK print  media (Guardian, Telegraph, Mail and Mirror) between 1979, 1989, 1999  and 2009 and found the following:

  • 40% drop in foreign news coverage in absolute terms
  • Today, international news only makes up 11% of news coverage (compared to 20% in 1979)
  • 80% drop in foreign news stories within the first 10 pages...

And it's not just about print. More chilling still, 'Shrinking World'  asked itself how India had been covered across the UK press online for  the first 3 months of 2009, and found that three-quarters of all stories were confined to the FT and BBC Online.

For Martin Moore, there are two blame-takers. The first is interest  on the part of the paper-buying audience (though "Shrinking World' would  counter by pointing to the growing readership of the global-facing FT  and Economist). And the second, of course, is the cost and the appalling  Return-on-Investment of shipping foreign correspondents around the  globe (It cost the New York Times c.$1m/yr /correspondent in the first  years of the Iraq war, and roughly $250,000 for a foreign correspondent  in the no-danger zones of the world).

But 'Shrinking World' does a very good job of not throwing all the  blame at the new economics of news. Of course, the financial constraints  under which news editors labour have had an impact - gone are the days  in which foreign correspondents travelled first class (as they did in  the 1960s, according to the Report). But there are many new ways of  gathering news - the AP, Reuters and AFP still function; the web and new  streaming/satellite technology has made content-sharing between  newspapers and broadcasters around the world considerably easier and  quicker (the Independent, for example, has sharing deals with al-Jazeera  English and France24); and a raft of new tech and new media (Facebook,  Twitter, Blogs, Demotix, etc...) has made access to global news - for  those who care for it - easier.

Martin Moore asks a far more interesting question around our appetite  for foreign news, and why that is shrinking. His answers speak both to  the shape of today's world, and Britain's place within it. He writes:  "The Cold War had provided a clear framework and rationale for covering  international affairs. A war in Angola, or example, could immediately be  placed in a bipolar Cold War context". Without that framework, so the  argument goes, and lumbered with the patently meaningless framework  offered to us by 'Global Terrorism' narratives, we are at a loss to  understand the world around us. Perhaps true, but the line could also be  taken further: our diminishing interest in foreign affairs clearly  mirrors our diminishing role in them. The 5 million-odd Britons living  around the globe are no longer the players and decision-makers, they are  economic or lifestyle migrants. We care for what we can affect.

What we lose, of course, with this inexorable curiosity-shrink is not  just our ability to interpret the world, and negotiate our futures  within it at a time when - ever increasingly - the lodestones of global  politics and economics shift further and further from our centre. We  lose something far harder to define and far more important. When the  Daily Mirror splashed John Pilger's 'Death of a Nation' report on  Cambodia's killing fields across the front page (and 8 other pages) on  12th September 1979, it told more than a story about the Khmer Rouge of  course. It talked to an understanding of humanity, of ethics, of broader  politics and its uses. Without foreign news, and the distance it  affords us on ourselves, we are condemned to talk only to each other and  only about ourselves within a closed circle. The highly articulate Dr.  Moore and his perfectly pitched report tells us how close we are to that  already.

Cross posted with thanks from Demotix

Turi Munthe

Turi Munthe is a publisher and writer whose work has appeared in The Economist, The Nation, and the TLS. He has edited The Saddam Hussein Reader: selections from leading writers on Iraq (<a href=http:

All articles

More in Cultural politics

See all

More from Turi Munthe

See all

Terrorism: not who but why?

/

Saddam’s Islamist legacy

/